Book Review
Good
Company:
The Company, A Short History
of a Revolutionary Idea
by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge
(The Modern Library, 2003)
reviewed by Richard A. Forsten,
Esquire
What one invention, more than any other, has contributed
to our worlds extraordinary progress and success? Paper.
Movable type. Gunpowder. The steam engine. The telephone. The
automobile. Radio. The transistor. The computer. The micro-chip.
Its an interesting question to say the least, and there
are lots of good arguments for and against various inventions.
But what if one of the greatest inventions contributing
to that success is not a tangible thing at all? What if one
of the greatest inventions is an intangible idea
specifically, the corporation, or, as authors John Micklethwait
and Adrian Wooldridge refer to it, the joint-stock, limited-liability
company.
Given Delawares status as the corporate
capital, its perhaps a bit easy to take corporations
for granted. Corporations are certainly important legal constructs,
and Delawares finely-tuned General Corporation Law a very
important part of this States success, but it isnt
very often (if at all), that someone identifies the corporation
as one of the greatest inventions of the western
world. And yet, like so much of what we take for granted, the
importance of the corporation as an invention is something easily
overlooked.
With their book, The Company, A Short History
of a Revolutionary Idea, authors Micklethwait and Wooldridge
demonstrate just how important a concept the corporation was
and is, making three important things possible: (1) large-scale
investment, (2) limited liability on the part of investors,
and (3) the ability for assets and an organization to survive
its owners. Without these things, so much more would not have
been possible for example, railroads, telephone networks,
and skyscrapers that it is difficult to imagine what
the world might be like with corporations.
The Company begins in ancient Mesopotamia,
and in a few short pages, runs through 4000 years of history,
including the Assyrians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Chinese
(who created large, state-controlled monopolies, which, while
enjoying large economies of scale, had other problems). It was
not until the Italian Renaissance that something close to modern
companies (large, family firms in which all members were jointly
liable) began to emerge.
In the 16th and 17th century, government-chartered
companies began to appear, the most famous of which was probably
the East India Company at one point accounting for nearly
half of Englands foreign trade. The Hudsons Bay
Company, founded in 1670, is still in existence (albeit in differentform),
making it the worlds oldest surviving multinational company.
But the chartered companies were just that
specially chartered. The really great leap forward came with
general corporation laws. Once freed of the capricious whims
of politics (at least in terms of getting started), businessmen
could concentrate on what they did best business
and business prospered. Micklethwait and Wooldridge, in relatively
few pages provide an overview of the history of the corporation
as an enterprise. Railroads, not surprisingly, were really the
first business to take advantage of the corporate form. Indeed,
given the capital requirements for a rail line, it seems doubtful
that the railroad boom of the 1800s would have been possible
without the corporate form. Other industries followed, and,
of course, the robber barons ultimately arrived, taking the
corporate form to, perhaps, its ultimate end in the absence
of anti-trust laws.
From the beginning of the 20th century to today,
the authors trace the ups and downs of the corporation. In 1973,
Sears and Roebuck opened the worlds tallest building,
and, ironically enough, the early seventies may have marked
the high point of the large corporation. Less than twenty years
later, Sam Walton (who had once been offered a job with Sears)
was Americas richest retailer, and Sears had a net loss
of $3.9 billion. Large corporations disappeared from the Fortune
500 to be replaced by upstarts like Netscape and Enron.
As the authors demonstrate, the last 25 years has seen an unbundling
of the corporation, as corporations have been forced to focus
on their core competencies. Fords River Rouge plant in
Dearborn, Michigan, for example, once employed 100,000 people
to produce 1,200 cars a day, making virtually all of the components
itself. Now, at the same plant, it employs only 3,000 people
to make 800 cars a day, using components produced elsewhere.
The Company traces the history of corporations
through the Enron scandal, and concludes with some thoughts
about the future of the company. It is interesting to note that
many of the same problems which plague the company and the stock
market today are some of the same problems which have plagued
companies since they were first being formed. The problem of
manager loyalty has been around since at least one Edward Fenton
who, given the captaincy of an East India ship in 1582, sailed
out of port only to announce to his crew a change of plans
instead of proceeding with the planned voyage, they would sail
to and capture the island of St. Helena, where Fenton would
be proclaimed king. Stock manipulation and stock bubbles also
date to some of the earliest chartered companies. In 1720, the
South Sea Company saw its stock price rise from 128 pounds in
January to a high of 950 pounds in July, before crashing later
that year and forcing Parliament to essentially nationalize
the company.
Micklethwait and Wooldridge are unabashed supporters
of the corporate form and the progress it has brought; but,
in their concluding paragraphs they express a fear for the future: