Ethically Speaking
Final Warning
by Charles Slanina, Esquire
Ethically Speaking sets aside our regularly scheduled
column to bring this important update. I intended to provide a
"substantive" article with pithy advice and supporting
caselaw. However, I have just finished my sixth disciplinary hearing
defending our brethren charged with books and records and tax
violations. I thought it time (although perhaps too late for some)
to issue a final warning.
If you have not noticed from the "IN RE:"
digests of disciplinary cases, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,
the Board on Professional Responsibility and the Supreme Court
are intent on insuring that books and records are maintained in
compliance with Rule 1.15 of the Professional Conduct Rules and
that all attorney taxes are filed and paid when due. In the past,
books and records transgressions such as a failure to reconcile
escrow accounts on a monthly basis, prompted a letter from the
Lawyer's Fund or the ODC requesting proof that the problem had
been corrected. Except in egregious cases, the most serious consequence
was the likelihood that the attorney or firm would be re-audited
at their own expense. However, since the introduction of the Certificate
of Compliance as part of the Annual Registration Statement (to
which attorneys must attest), the situation has become much more
serious.
The same books and records violations are now compounded
by the fact that the attorney has filed a "false" Statement,
which the Court uncharitably views as a violation of Rule 8.4
of the Professional Conduct Rules, 8.4(c) involving dishonesty,
fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; or 8.4(d) conduct prejudicial
to the administration of justice or both.
The random or targeted audits of the Lawyer's Fund
for Client Protection are also noting tax delinquencies. I strongly
suggest that you take measures to review the work done by your
bookkeepers, office managers, payroll service and even your accountants
to confirm that all employee withholding taxes such as the Federal
941's are being timely filed and paid. As a number of my former
clients could now tell you, the monthly or quarterly voucher must
be filed when due even if the money is unavailable to pay the
withholding. Failure to pay the taxes when due is still a disciplinary
matter but a record of having filed the returns when due and entering
into a payment plan with the tax authorities greatly enhances
your position. Failure to both timely file and pay compounds the
matter.
Above all, do not file your Annual Registration
Statement unless or until you have confirmed that your books and
records are maintained in compliance with Rule 1.15 and that all
personal and professional taxes have been timely filed and paid.
To gain the confidence necessary to sign the Certificate of Compliance,
I also recommend that you employ a Certified Public Accountant
to pre-certify your compliance.
Preferably, that accountant should be familiar with
the Rule 1.15 books and records requirements and the certification
process. If not, your accountant can contact Martin Zukoff, The
Lawyer's Fund accountant, or download the audit checklist from
the Supreme Court website to determine the requirements of the
re-certification. Such pre-certifications may not ward off compliance
audits. However, if a problem is later determined as a result
of the audit, they serve as excellent evidence of the attorney's
good faith in signing the Certificate accompanying the Annual
Registration Statement.
Today, most sanctions for books and records violations
coupled with "false" certifications or tax delinquencies
with "false" certifications or both, have resulted in
public reprimands and probation. Neither the Board nor the Court
have been persuaded by the argument that the matter had been entrusted
to staff and that the attorney was unaware of the violations.
Such a defense argument is likely to add an additional count in
the Petition alleging a Rule 5.3 violation for failure to adequately
supervise non-lawyer assistants.
As you all know by now, a large part of my practice
is disciplinary defense and this recent crack-down by ODC has
kept me busy. While I strongly recommend that you review these
issues with your office staff, your accountant and with your own
eyes, if you fail to do so, I certainly appreciate the business.
Additional Update
As we go to press, the new Model Rules on Multi-Jurisdictional
Practice has passed the ABA House of Delegates at the annual meeting
in Washington, DC. The Model Rules would allow a lawyer licensed
and in good standing in one state to practice temporarily in the
following circumstances:
These changes will not be binding unless approved
by the local jurisdictions. However, as a reminder, our own Chief
Justice, E. Norman Veasey, chairs the Ethics 2000 Commission.
Can a speedy adoption of the Model be far behind?
Enjoy the rest of the summer.
"Ethically Speaking" is
intended to stimulate awareness of ethical issues. It is not intended
as legal advice nor does it necessarily represent the opinion
of the Delaware State Bar Association.
Return to September 2002
Table of Contents.